X-Git-Url: http://git.openafs.org/?p=openafs-wiki.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=PerformanceWork.mdwn;h=7a31b7c3d76ca0f3429ecd63ea1f8d329eabd996;hp=73cee33ed1271070b603e5ef16712a47e70c84d5;hb=d29b783323f608186f7a613f92717406c203e539;hpb=bc411d59e4c4872b9d4a97b3cfe7ccccbfd0c7c6

diff --git a/PerformanceWork.mdwn b/PerformanceWork.mdwn
index 73cee33..7a31b7c 100644
--- a/PerformanceWork.mdwn
+++ b/PerformanceWork.mdwn
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ From a [message](https://lists.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-info/2003-April/008
 
 > I was wondering how Solaris x86 would be doing as AFS fileserver compared to Red Hat 7.3 Linux on the same hardware.
 >
-> I've conducted some benchmarks using [[PostMark|Main/PerformanceWork#PostMark]] and arla's afsfsperf to get an answer (not _the_ answer!) to this question.
+> I've conducted some benchmarks using [[PostMark|PerformanceWork#PostMark]] and arla's afsfsperf to get an answer (not _the_ answer!) to this question.
 >
 > I've used [[OpenAFS]]-1.2.8 with inode and namei interface on Solaris with non-logging and logging file system for the /vicepa partition.
 >
@@ -79,4 +79,4 @@ From a [message](https://lists.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-info/2003-April/008
 
 ----
 
--- [[TedAnderson]] - 25 Apr 2003
+-- Ted Anderson - 25 Apr 2003