none

diff --git a/AFSLore/OpenAFSWebsiteProjectPage.mdwn b/AFSLore/OpenAFSWebsiteProjectPage.mdwn
index e1767e7..b545bd9 100644 (file)
--- a/AFSLore/OpenAFSWebsiteProjectPage.mdwn
+++ b/AFSLore/OpenAFSWebsiteProjectPage.mdwn
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 - [[WebsiteProposedSurveyQuestions]]
 - [[WebsiteProposedSurveyMethods]]
 
-The new website should be geared towards the user and the users needs, whereas the current website is directed at the needs of the developers. Developers have entirely different needs than users, and should therefore have a specific, separate site dedicated towards them.
+The new website should be geared towards the user and the users needs, whereas the current website tends to be more directed at the needs of the developers. Developers have entirely different needs than users, and should therefore have a specific, separate site dedicated towards them. However, this does not mean that the current site is all the developers need, just that the development site has a different set of needs, outside of the scope of a site targeted at users.
 
 The new website should be an integrated experience for the users. Some sites to look at for design include:
 
@@ -25,5 +25,6 @@ Some effective parts of the [FreeBSD](http://www.freebsd.org) site include:
   - important information that is no longer current, but still relevant
   - upcoming events or information that will be relevant
 - the content in the box is also provided in RSS which allows users to follow the feeds, and access information easily
+- The "New to [[FreeBSD]]" section provides information to prospective users of [[FreeBSD]], something similar is warranted
 
 -- [[JacobThebaultSpieker]] - 12 Nov 2008

diff --git a/AFSLore/WebsiteProposedSurveyMethods.mdwn b/AFSLore/WebsiteProposedSurveyMethods.mdwn
index 3b3c95e..d6ee5c9 100644 (file)
--- a/AFSLore/WebsiteProposedSurveyMethods.mdwn
+++ b/AFSLore/WebsiteProposedSurveyMethods.mdwn
@@ -1,8 +1,6 @@
-We are currently considering multiple online surveys options including:
+These observations have been made solely on the free versions of each of these survey providers. It's possible that some of the concerns addressed are fixed/modified in the pay-for versions.
 
-- www.surveymonkey.com
-- www.polldaddy.com
-- www.limeservice.com
+----
 
 Features deemed important to a survey service include:
 
@@ -10,6 +8,28 @@ Features deemed important to a survey service include:
 - The ability to insert images into the survey
 - Conditional branching based on responses provided by the user
 
+We are currently considering multiple online surveys options including:
+
+- www.surveymonkey.com
+  - Clean interface
+  - seems to be unable to use image uploads for multiple choice questions
+  - ensures one cannot vote from the same computer
+  - analysis seems pretty standard, in terms of options
+- www.polldaddy.com
+  - Very easy interface
+  - seems to cut out some of the control from the admin interface
+  - also unable to use images for multiple choice questions
+  - also ensures 'vote stuffing' doesn't happen (no voting from the same computer multiple times)
+  - conditional branching capable, but seemingly unable to make sure users only see a question if answer the initial question a different way (eg. user will eventually get to all the questions, regardless of the branching)
+    - I might be mistaken, there may be a way to change this -JacobThebaultSpieker
+  - analysis seems pretty standard in terms of options
+- www.limeservice.com
+  - full featured free account
+  - interface provides substantially more control, seemingly
+  - icon driven interface, kind of awkward to use
+  - control over conditional branching is much better
+  - statistics/analysis seems more fine-grained
+
 Please provide any feedback you may have as to other online survey options, or your experiences with any of the services being considered.
 
 -- [[JacobThebaultSpieker]] - 12 Nov 2008