From: Derrick Brashear <shadow@dementia.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:40:32 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: comment assumptions in lih0_r
X-Git-Tag: openafs-devel-1_5_73~35
X-Git-Url: http://git.openafs.org/?p=openafs.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=88a40ffd3b82f3ca1a1b2d57f32859a9d57b922e;hp=c9761464e7d8f1446862a3c94d900c74403b0f07

comment assumptions in lih0_r

previously, we checked for  (!held && !h_OtherHolds_r(host))
now, we want to confirm only we hold it, so comment that that's how
this works

Change-Id: I98a65fbb4f2d0532054c71699dc2168e4592668b
Reviewed-on: http://gerrit.openafs.org/1598
Reviewed-by: Derrick Brashear <shadow@dementia.org>
Tested-by: Derrick Brashear <shadow@dementia.org>
---

diff --git a/src/viced/callback.c b/src/viced/callback.c
index b5006a1..9cfd1d5 100644
--- a/src/viced/callback.c
+++ b/src/viced/callback.c
@@ -1533,6 +1533,7 @@ lih0_r(register struct host *host, register int flags, void *rock)
 {
     struct lih_params *params = (struct lih_params *)rock;
 
+    /* OTHER_MUSTHOLD_LIH is because the h_Enum loop holds us once */
     if (host->cblist
 	&& (!(host->hostFlags & HOSTDELETED))
 	&& (host->refCount < OTHER_MUSTHOLD_LIH)