From 167e1aa21f5bbea1272b239dc6518a7bdbfc3ee6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Derrick Brashear Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:03:07 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] xdrproc_t probably not really different on linux26 for some reason we prototype it differently. makes xdr_free sad. Change-Id: Icd6060acd922314fc400aa2fe360c662ec705fa6 Reviewed-on: http://gerrit.openafs.org/1179 Reviewed-by: Simon Wilkinson Reviewed-by: Derrick Brashear Tested-by: Derrick Brashear --- src/rx/xdr.h | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/rx/xdr.h b/src/rx/xdr.h index 677952e..c91d17a 100644 --- a/src/rx/xdr.h +++ b/src/rx/xdr.h @@ -174,15 +174,7 @@ enum xdr_op { * allocate dynamic storage of the appropriate size and return it. * bool_t (*xdrproc_t)(XDR *, caddr_t *); */ -#if 0 -typedef bool_t(*xdrproc_t) (); -#else -#ifdef AFS_I386_LINUX26_ENV -typedef bool_t(*xdrproc_t) (void *, caddr_t, u_int); -#else typedef bool_t(*xdrproc_t) (void *, ...); -#endif -#endif /* -- 1.9.4